From the Cluttered Bench: Why Does Cycling Keep It Retro While Other Sports Move On?

38 comments by Scott Gater

Have you ever noticed that cycling seems to have a special place for retro aesthetics? We started thinking about it the other day, and it led us to question: is cycling the only outdoor sport that still makes room for vintage gear and style? When we mentally surveyed other sports, few seemed to embrace older technology.

Take tennis, for example—does anyone still use a wooden racket? Or golf—who’s still swinging a wooden-shafted club? The closest comparisons we found were in the surf world with longboards—those traditional, 8-foot-plus boards that contrast with modern shortboards designed for sharp, radical turns—and the skateboarding scene, where retro 80s-style decks are making a comeback, at least according to our resident expert.

                

So why cycling and board sports? My best guess is that these "soul sports"—surfing, skateboarding, and non-competitive cycling—allow people to do their own thing. There are no strict rules, no judges, and no specific uniforms to adhere to. You can ride a bike with silver fenders and a rack, surf a classic longboard, or skate a retro deck, all while staying true to your personal style.

 

                       

Once competition enters the mix, though, it’s a different story. The need to win drives technological advancements, which explains why racing-focused cycling is so tech-heavy—what I like to call the "1%." It’s the same reason no one gets extra points for playing tennis with a wooden racket. But in the non-competitive cycling world, riding a steel frame decked out with classic parts is almost like a statement. You see someone cruising with vintage flair, and it just makes you smile.

This vintage appeal seems to pop up in all sorts of ways today, even beyond cycling. Fashion and style are always cycling back—though I'm still waiting for the Roaring 20s to make a return! Right now, the 80s and 90s are making waves in clothing, décor, and even bike culture, as people look for ways to stand out from the sleek, performance-driven products that dominate the big brands.

velo orange campeur against rocks fenders racks

Functionality is another reason retro gear holds appeal in cycling. Modern tech has made huge leaps—electronic shifting and hydraulic braking are prime examples—but they can feel over-engineered. Mechanical disc brakes give me reliable stopping power without the hassle of bleeding lines, and traditional cable shifting lasts forever with minimal upkeep. Plus, I never have to worry about charging my derailleur!

While big companies focus on racing performance at any cost—like a $4,300 wireless Campagnolo 13-speed drivetrain—I think the non-racing side of cycling will keep chugging along at a more relaxed pace, free from the need to adopt every new high-cost innovation.

So why do you think retro aesthetics thrive in cycling but not in other sports? I’d love to hear your thoughts, so drop a comment below!

The Cluttered Bench is a series of opinion pieces from VO staffers and guests on various topics that may be tangentially cycling related.


38 comments


  • randy siepser

    being 69 and starting racing in ‘68 where we all pretty much had the exact same bike weighing the same, (only difference being name on the frame somewhere, d.t. mainly); e.g., lugged steel italian, french, british, american, other euro, etc, everything always worked because everything was simple, only time on the side of the road being a flat sewup and u always had a spare (some people 2 for long rides); to me, quality was always there; u could work on your bike at home with basic tools and instruction from shop mech; e.g, bottom bracket, headset adjust, cone wrench tools, etc…as long as the derailleurs/shifters and brake cables and anchor bolts, bb, hs cups and hub cones were tight and properly adjusted, u were good to go…very few moveable, pivoting mechanisms to go wrong…being 36 hole rims, handbuilt, u could get home still if a spoke broke….i ride my Marinoni not because it’s vintage or gets cyclist’s attention or for L’oirca; no…i ride it because it just simply feels great and i’ve tried c.f. and while it accelerates and climbs magnificently, i don’t appreciate the ride, different harmonic, very stiff, no give, feel every surface imperfection but again, this coming from someone from my era so that might be typical reaction/response to someone having ridden lugged steel for 55 years…notice today’s pro racers on tv how they have many more mechanicals vs my days and are left stranded on the side of the road until a team/neutral support car comes by because so many complicated intricate elements to the bike are at play…didn’t have that back then…one can’t even work on their own bike today, requiring a shop pro with all this integrated mechanical or electronic shifting, disk brakes needing bleeding out hydraulic lines, tubeless tyres never really sealing perfectly, rotors bending, low spoke count at such high tension from machine built wheels that if a spoke breaks, it’ll fly off center line so much, the wheel will hit the frame and u won’t get home…i saw that with a riding partner; had to call AAA


  • Douglas M
    I am a commuter, occasional tourist and local grocery run sort of rider with roads to my north, east and south having little more than shallow grades to climb up and ride down on but there are many miles of long, steep hills to my west and my interpretation of the term retro gets to durability, practicality, reliability and utility, with my bikes using 8-speed chain except two with 5-speed chain.

  • Martin Neale

    As well as musical instruments and boats already mentioned above, if we think of non-racing bicycles as vehicles then the obvious comparison is to vintage cars, motorcycles, etc. Great looks and usually simpler to work on.


  • Tim argo

    badminton or table tennis come to mind. Over engineering bikes is about money. Simplicity is timeless,cheap, and more reliable. What else is there?


  • Rick Thompson

    The other activities you mention, golf and tennis, are only done as competitive sports with the goal of doing better than the competition. Cycling is done for many other reasons, where the tech would have little effect except much higher cost.


Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.